As European countries are actively militarizing, refusing to negotiate and acting against their own best interests to provoke a full scale war, returning to competent diplomacy, neutrality and peace must become the priority.
I thought regime change and other interference in internal affairs of countries was not legal under international law, and thus there should be an effort to rewrite the definition of war to include such things as acts of war. A country engaging in acts of war against another cannot not be considered neutral toward the subject country.
Similarly sanctions are well recognized as economic warfare. Why not update the international laws and definitions of neutrality to preclude that?
In particular, such changes could facilitate citizens of countries such as USA to impeach their presidents who engage in internationally illegal behavior without a mandate from their parliaments.
Questions for Pascal next time you chat with him:
I thought regime change and other interference in internal affairs of countries was not legal under international law, and thus there should be an effort to rewrite the definition of war to include such things as acts of war. A country engaging in acts of war against another cannot not be considered neutral toward the subject country.
Similarly sanctions are well recognized as economic warfare. Why not update the international laws and definitions of neutrality to preclude that?
In particular, such changes could facilitate citizens of countries such as USA to impeach their presidents who engage in internationally illegal behavior without a mandate from their parliaments.